"To some three is a crowd. To me, it’s a threesome."
To numerologist three is the number of a relationship. There is me, you and, the third, us. To the Chemical Buddha, three was the minimum needed to have a good time. He would also agree that it was the number of a relationship as in the number to have in a relationship. The most sacred version of the number three being two females and The Chemical Buddha. Of course, there was no way TCB could come close to satisfying one woman, let alone two women. But he always hoped they would please each other and he could watch as he drifted off to sleep.
Have you ever prejudged your potential partner? What was the impact? Did they surprise you or live up (or down) to your expectations?
What are the minimum things you require in a relationship?
What are the little extras you can bring to make your relationships last?
Showing posts with label threesome. Show all posts
Showing posts with label threesome. Show all posts
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Cold Nose
"If you don’t feel guilty, did you do anything wrong?"
Note: this insight goes with the previous two. The Chemical Buddha believed that if you consciously decided to do something, then you shouldn't feel guilty. Now there might be unintended consequences of your actions, but that's not called guilt. That's called learning. While The Chemical Buddha often did things that hurt people, he was usually doing what he wanted to do. And while he might (I repeat, might) feel bad about hurting people, he would usually do what he did again. To him, if you knew the outcome and would still do what you did, you shouldn't feel guilty. He called that making a tough choice. So to bring this full circle, when he had the chance to sleep with his best friend's wife and his of age daughter, he did it. They were there (his best friend was not) and his dick was hard. Of course, it did end his friendship and alienated a lot of people, but given the choice, he would soooo do it again. OK. Maybe he wouldn't have the dog lick his balls. Its cold nose was a little distracting.
Do you worry about hurting people's feelings?
Does hurting other people keep you from making tough choices? If so, what one choice are you willing to make regardless of the consequences?
Note: this insight goes with the previous two. The Chemical Buddha believed that if you consciously decided to do something, then you shouldn't feel guilty. Now there might be unintended consequences of your actions, but that's not called guilt. That's called learning. While The Chemical Buddha often did things that hurt people, he was usually doing what he wanted to do. And while he might (I repeat, might) feel bad about hurting people, he would usually do what he did again. To him, if you knew the outcome and would still do what you did, you shouldn't feel guilty. He called that making a tough choice. So to bring this full circle, when he had the chance to sleep with his best friend's wife and his of age daughter, he did it. They were there (his best friend was not) and his dick was hard. Of course, it did end his friendship and alienated a lot of people, but given the choice, he would soooo do it again. OK. Maybe he wouldn't have the dog lick his balls. Its cold nose was a little distracting.
Do you worry about hurting people's feelings?
Does hurting other people keep you from making tough choices? If so, what one choice are you willing to make regardless of the consequences?
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Damn You
"Some sins are worth risking eternal damnation."
The Chemical Buddha found that how sins were defined changed throughout time. Murder has always been considered the utmost. However, if you accidentally kill someone that seems to be OK. Adultery, while sort of bad now isn't nearly as frowned upon as it was 500 years ago. So this changing sin gauge made The Chemical Buddha wonder if there were souls in hell that were thinking, "Fuck, I’m in eternal damnation for something that's no big deal now. Shit! This sucks." Or do they get out of hell as values change up here? It really didn't matter to The Chemical Buddha because the pursuit of making a TCB sandwich with his best friend's wife and their age of consent daughter while the family dog licked his balls was worth any consequences.
How have your perceptions of what is 'bad' and what is 'good' changed over time?
What one thing are you willing to risk anything to get?
The Chemical Buddha found that how sins were defined changed throughout time. Murder has always been considered the utmost. However, if you accidentally kill someone that seems to be OK. Adultery, while sort of bad now isn't nearly as frowned upon as it was 500 years ago. So this changing sin gauge made The Chemical Buddha wonder if there were souls in hell that were thinking, "Fuck, I’m in eternal damnation for something that's no big deal now. Shit! This sucks." Or do they get out of hell as values change up here? It really didn't matter to The Chemical Buddha because the pursuit of making a TCB sandwich with his best friend's wife and their age of consent daughter while the family dog licked his balls was worth any consequences.
How have your perceptions of what is 'bad' and what is 'good' changed over time?
What one thing are you willing to risk anything to get?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
